My initial inspiration for this piece was Trifles, which...

My initial inspiration for this piece was Trifles, which funnily enough only shares the characteristic of detectives being involved within the plot. As per suggestion on my proposal, I developed my idea of detectives solving a case further by including dialogue and inter-personnel relationships similar to those found in Glengarry Glen Ross. Taking the idea of different members of the real-estate office discussing work and plotting in Glengarry Glen Ross, and applying them to a trio of detectives on a case was interesting to say the least. Upon first thinking of what I wanted to get across, I knew that some form of conspiracy was going to be present. This was done in the revelation at the end that Chris actually was working with their†¦show more content†¦This is why towards the end of the play he walks off-stage never to return. Chris, I wrote with the intention of making him an arrogant jerk, or someone that you would hate to work with. James countered his personality to some extent, or would have if the victim had not been his friend. I made this a point so that James would be off his game, so to speak. This would justify in Chris’s mind why he would need to act on the chief’s wishes and kill James. In regards to the ending, I chose to end the play on an ill-fitting monologue of sorts. It was jarring enough to not fit the way the rest of the dialogue was given during the bulk of the play, for I wanted to get across that Chris was far worse of a person than just being arrogant. James in the end lets his anger with Chris subside to the point that he may think that Chris is trying to apologize by offering to get him a drink. This thought will inevitably prove to be another lack of judgment by James. Overall, the process of writing a play was a fun experience that I would like to come back to at some point in time, possibly to expand this story in which I have now crafted. Creating three distinct characters was quite a challenge, and writing a story with nothing but dialogue for the most part was also difficult; for the most part it is miles apart from writing fiction. Drawing inspiration from Glengarry Glen Ross helped set

The Debate About An American Citizen - 910 Words

Zane Vigil Professor Hoffman English 4/6/15 The Debate You Never Knew About As an American Citizen, we have certain unalienable rights such as Freedom of Speech and Freedom of Religion that are so essential to our existence in a world of oppression that they are deeply ingrained into the fabric of our society. They of course come from our great Constitution as does another essential right, The Right To Bear Arms, which translates to, â€Å"the right to self protection†.Thankfully, under the current framework of the law, qualified citizens are allowed to apply for a â€Å"Concealed Carry Weapon (or â€Å"Handgun†) License†, or a â€Å"CCW† as it will be known henceforth. On June 11th, 2003 the first ever application of a concept known as â€Å"Constitutional Carry†Ã¢â‚¬ ¦show more content†¦Through out the world, America is known as the home of freedom and the land of opportunity. Many a man, woman, and child holds the hope that one day they too will be able to travel to â€Å"the land of opportunity† and make a better life for themselves. This hope is what gave the founders of this great country the bravery to rise up against their British colonial rulers and the steadfast perseverance to sail into the unknown without a clue what laid ahead. After having firearms and other weapons taken away from them in England by the King’s Men so they could not revolt, it became clear that bearing arms is of vital importance for a free society. So clear in fact that when The Bill Of Rights was written, The Right To Bear Arms became The Second Amendment, just behind The First Amendment: The Freedom Of Speech, Press, and Religion. Originally, Concealed Carry legislation’s purpose was to ban the carrying of concealed weapons (namely handguns) with the reasoning that anyone concealing a handgun is up to no good and wants the element of surprise. Keep in mind that this was back in the day when having a holstered handgun at your hip was a socially acceptable and widespread practice so the need for concealment generally seemed shady. Obviously, most people don’t exactly walk around with handguns holstered at their hips anymore but only over the past 60 years or so

Analysis of Poems Eurydice and Mrs. Midas by Carol-Ann Duffy free essay sample

A woman’s voice, her opinion and her viewpoint have all been heavily disregarded in the past centuries, with a woman being seen as an accessory to a man rather than an individual with the capability to think for herself. However, Carol Ann Duffy’s anthology ‘The World’s Wife’ seeks to correct the gender inequalities, with the poems Eurydice and Mrs. Midas portraying strong minded and authoritative females that retell the Greek mythological stories from a women’s point of view. In both poems Eurydice and Mrs. Midas we are introduced to two women who in mythology have been overshadowed by their more famous husbands or left out of the story completely. Through Duffy’s extensive use of language features such as humour and metaphors in the poem Mrs. Midas, we are able to understand the previously unheard point of view of Mr. Midas as she comprehends the breaking down of her marriage to the mythological King Midas and deals with the selfishness of her Husband’s wish for the ‘golden touch’. Through the use of allusions, capitalization and humour in the poem Eurydice we can see Duffy’s intent to transform the original Greek myth of Orpheus and Eurydice to give a rather unspoken and innocent Eurydice a new devious persona. Duffy seeks to make the reader consider another viewpoint in a rather one dimensional society by allowing Eurydice to voice her opinion of not wanting to return to Orpheus despite him trying to rescue her â€Å"with his lyre and a poem to pitch with me as the prize†. In Mrs. Midas, Carol Ann Duffy introduces the character Mrs Midas as your typical housewife as â€Å"I’d just poured myself a glass of wine, begun to unwind, while the vegetables cooked. † The first use of assonance, in the long ‘I’ vowel sound creates a sense of calm before the big storm, before King Midas’ golden touch destroys their marriage. The setting for the first stanza of the poem is set with the aid of imagery which is used to create an optimistic and happy relationship between Mrs. Midas and her surroundings with a carefree attitude. However when Mrs. Midas spots her husband when â€Å"he was under the pear-tree snapping a twig† the tone of the poem changes as the line introduces some violence, and foreshadows the breaking of Mrs. Midas’ marriage to her husband, King Midas. In Eurydice, Duffy also uses language to foreshadow the apex of the poem, where Eurydice refuses to follow Orpheus back from the underworld. â€Å"Girls, forget what you’ve read. It happened like this,† is the turning point where the reader realises the first half of the poem is not how the series of events occurred, but rather the following stanzas is how the story really went from Eurydice’s point of view. The direct address of â€Å"girls† grabs the attention of the reader to show a sudden transformation of the original myth being told, which implies that the outcome from the original tale has been disregarded, helping to foreshadow what Eurydice’s real actions were; â€Å"I stretched out my hand to touch him once on the back of the neck He was smiling modestly, when he turned, when he turned and looked at me,† these events allowing Eurydice to stay in the underworld where she wanted to stay. Duffy uses language to design Mrs. Midas’ character as a pretentious housewife trying to be in a higher social class than she is. Through subtle sentences like â€Å"We’d a caravan in the wilds, in a glade of its own† where she brags that her caravan has its own glade, gives Mrs. Midas a pretentious attitude. Additionally Duffy uses assonance in â€Å"He asked where was the wine†¦a fragrant bone dry white wine from Italy†¦Ã¢â‚¬  with a long ‘I’ sound slowing the pace and creating a genteel sound that mimics the middle class accent. However Duffy uses the language feature of diction to change the nature of the poem. From smooth, rolling words of imagery – â€Å"†¦as he picked up the glass, goblet, golden chalice, drank. † to direct, short, monosyllabic sentences -â€Å"He came into the house. The doorknobs gleamed. † The change of tone and following short sentences are used to show how through the surfacing anxiety of Mrs. Midas, she is able to carefully explain her every action with comments such as â€Å"I locked the cat in the cellar. I moved the phone. The toilet I didn’t mind. † The use of humour not only breaks down the barrier between the reader and herself, but also releases her previous pretentious attitudes. Yet looking through this use of humour, we can see how Mrs. Midas is still taking control of her situation which effectively place her in a more dominant and authoritative role in the relationship between herself and King Midas. In both Mrs. Midas and Eurydice, Duffy uses allusions to compare different things. For example, in Eurydice by alluding to characters familiar to the reader such as â€Å"Him. Big O,† famous singer Roy Orbison, the reader can understand what Orpheus was truly like in Eurydice’s opinion. A familiar knock-knock-knock at death’s door,† another allusion, to Bob Dylan’s â€Å"knocking on Heaven’s door,† symbolises that Eurydice’s death, leaving her in the underworld and free from Orpheus is her idea of heaven. Both of these allusions allowing the reader to make comparisons and links between the characters and familiar people and songs. Duffy also alludes to gold several times in the poem Mrs. Midas. With sente nces such as â€Å"And who, when it comes to the crunch, can live with a heart of gold? †